Wednesday, October 26, 2016

Update on Carbon Washington

Monday, October 24, 2016

An Upcoming Interview

This coming Friday, I will be interviewed by Frank Conway at an Economics Teaching Conference.  You can hear a live broadcast of the interview by registering here.

Friday, October 21, 2016

In Praise of High Prices

Click here to read my column in Sunday's New York Times.

Normative Ethics and Welfare Economics

For the next couple days, I will be hanging out at this conference.  Various papers available at the link.

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Why Are Interest Rates So Low? Causes and Implications

Friday, October 14, 2016

What I've been doing

Today and tomorrow, I am attending this conference at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. Papers and some videos available at the link.

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

Trump's Economist

Monday, October 10, 2016

The Nobel

Thursday, October 06, 2016

New Videos from the NBER

1. "The Dramatic Economics of the U.S. Market for Higher Education," Caroline Hoxby's Martin Feldstein Lecture.

2. "Matching Markets and Market Design," the 2016 Methods Lectures, which were presented by Atila Abdulkadiroglu, Nikhil Agarwal, Itai Ashlagi, Parag Pathak, and Al Roth.

3. "The Economic Consequences of Brexit," a panel discussion with presentations by Richard Baldwin, Jeffrey Frankel, Anil Kashyap, Helene Rey, and Thomas Sampson.

How Trump paid so little in taxes.

Tuesday, October 04, 2016

Harvard Scholars on President Obama

Monday, October 03, 2016

Fight for Fifteen?

Thursday, September 29, 2016


Regular readers of this blog know that I often disagree with Paul Krugman.  But I come here today to agree with a recent post of his on the analysis put out by two Trump economic advisers.  The Trump advisers' analysis is truly disappointing (though perhaps not surprisingly so, given what the candidate has said over the course of the campaign).

Their analysis of trade deficits, starting on page 18, boils down to the following: We know that GDP=C+I+G+NX.  NX is negative (the trade deficit).  Therefore, if we somehow renegotiate trade deals and make NX rise to zero, GDP goes up!  They calculate this will bring in $1.74 trillion in tax revenue over a decade.

But of course you can't model an economy just using the national income accounts identity. Even a freshman at the end of ec 10 knows that trade deficits go hand in hand with capital inflows.  So an end to the trade deficit means an end to the capital inflow, which would affect interest rates, which in turn influence consumption and investment.

I suppose that their calculations might make sense in the simplest Keynesian Cross model, in which investment is exogenously fixed  and consumption only depends on income.  But that is surely not the right model for analyzing the impact of trade policy over the course of a decade.

Wednesday, September 28, 2016

A Trailer for the Pigou Club

Saturday, September 17, 2016

Bank stocks are just as risky now as they were before the financial crisis

That is the most interesting thing I learned at the recent BPEA meeting.  Click here to learn more.

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

Diagnosing and Treating the Slow Recovery

Monday, September 12, 2016

We're number one!

Ec 10, that is.  And another economics course is number four.

Saturday, September 10, 2016

Equity and the Estate Tax

Click here to read my column in Sunday's NY Times.

Thursday, September 08, 2016

Wehner on Orwell on Fierce Modesty

I enjoyed this essay by Peter Wehner.  It is not about economics, but the lesson should be heeded by anyone who engages in the national debate over economic policy.

Wednesday, September 07, 2016

Economics Teaching Conference

Economics educators may be interested in this upcoming conference. Frank Conway, founder of the Economic Rockstar, will interview me at the conference.